Reason #9,876 Why NOW Sucks

by Marina Martin

in FUME

I’m very seriously considering starting an anti-National Organization for Women blog. Maybe one already exists. (*Googles*) Not as far as I can tell. There needs to be one. The mere word “now,” previously an innocent chronological reference, has been tarnished forever.

For the record, I am horrified by the thought of Obama OR Hillary becoming President. But I am particularly horrified by the suggestion that I should consider Hillary to be more qualified than Obama for anything besides an annual pap smear on the basis of her gender.

Apparently NOW (New York State chapter) believes that Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Obama instead of Hillary is a “betrayal” of women. The only thing that stopped me from losing my (delicious) banana smoothie lunch was the fact that the press release was clearly written AND approved by people with fifth-grade writing abilities.

The full text (directly from their website):

Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, and the Family and Medical Leave Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.

And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one). “They” are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). “They” are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women’s money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future.

This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation- to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who “know what’s best for us.

Worse: In a second press release, they liken anyone who does not wholeheartedly support Hillary to a GANG RAPIST. (Or, in their uneducated words, a “ganged” rapist.) What delusional freaks! I don’t even know how to begin to touch on that vile garbage. Clearly (and thankfully) no one involved in the creation of that gem has actually experienced sexual violence (or perhaps even Real Life).

In case they take it down, and to avoid being accused of selective copy and paste, here’s the entire piece:

We’ve all witnessed scenarios where, on the playground little girls are being taunted by little boys while both girls and boys stand idle, afraid to speak up or even cheering. Or, in the workplace males tease young and older female co-workers; make obscene gestures, inappropriate comments, laughing and expecting (often correctly) that everyone will join in. Then there was that movie where Jodie Foster portrayed the true story of woman who was ganged raped in a bar while others looked on and encouraged the realization. Still others pretended the rape didn’t happen. In short, gang raping of women is commonplace in our culture both physically and metaphorically.

This past week, we witnessed just such a phenomenon involving men who are afraid of a powerful woman. Hillary Clinton, in her quest for her Presidential nomination, has in fact endured infantile taunting and wildly inappropriate commentary. Indeed we have witnessed almost comical attacks by John Edwards who in turn sided with Barak Obama as both snickered at Clinton’s “breakdown,” which consisted of a very short dewy-eyed moment. Now John Kerry, who should certainly know better after his own “swiftboating,” has joined the playground gang.

But here’s the news. Every woman knows how it feels! There are those who will dismiss, defend or even shame those around them into believing that we progressives are making a mountain out of a mole hill. But that’s the game plan of the patriarchal system that has persisted for millennia. Because they can’t frighten Hillary they’ve decided to control her with the time-old trick of patriarchal ridicule. Women, you know what I mean!

Pundits want to know what happened in New Hampshire. Why didn’t the polls see it coming? How could they have gotten it so wrong? Well, aside from the thousands of women and progressive men who made calls from their homes, dropped literature, and held house parties for undecided voters, the truth of the matter is…women get it! That’s why, when women in New Hampshire could vote in private, they came out in droves for Hillary. They’d seen more Hillary bashing than had Iowa’s women, and the polls stopped too early to measure their collective reaction. What happened is that women stood up and said “We’re fed up and we’re not going to take it anymore! We won’t sit idly by and watch, while you gang bang one of us.” One woman told me she didn’t even want to vote for Hillary because she feared that her campaign would be the most dreadful blood bath in the history of politics. I asked her “if Hillary is willing to stick her neck out for us, should we not be brave enough to stand strong behind her?” She agreed and said of course she would vote for Hillary.

We have waited a long time to see our first truly viable women presidential candidate. And what we see now during the debates is what women and girls have experienced from time immemorial. But it seems John’s recent alliance with Barak sent a clear message to women everywhere. The message is that if a woman gets too powerful, she can count on the good ole boys ganging up on her. Hillary is a powerful, strong and intelligent woman and she deserves our support. Let us remember what we as women’s rights supporters, are charged to do: SUPPORT WOMEN!

And I, your writer,certainly speak from the belly of the beast. I was in Iowa for ten days with other feminist leaders, donating our personal time and money to help with Hillary’s campaign. And in spite of our shortfall in Iowa, we did make a difference. Our efforts gave Hillary second place in the precinct we walked. Let me tell you why.

Our job on caucus night was to transport eight women from a nursing home to their caucus site. These were eighty-to-ninety-year-old women who came out in the cold weather and climbed into our vans to stand for Hillary. As we talked with glee about the possibility of our first women president, we were overjoyed to hear stories of their dedication to making it happen. One woman said “I never thought I would live long enough to see a woman president.” Another woman said “It’s about time; we need to have a woman as our President.” These were women who were born around the time that women won the right to vote. They’d heard first-hand stories of that struggle from their mothers and grandmothers. They fought long and hard to see a day when they could have their own credit cards, own their own homes and be in control of their own bodies. They remember all too well when it was legal for a man to beat and/or rape his wife because she was HIS property. They remember when “rape” was ignored by people in the community and law enforcement officials. “She must have done something to deserve it” was common language in those days. Today we still see variations on this same behavior, more subtle perhaps, through success of our efforts, but nonetheless still abusive.

Now those senior citizens we transported stood tall for Hillary, and want us all to know that to have a woman president is to send a clear message to little girls everywhere: “Yes, you can do great things and even become President of the United States.” Those senior citizens really get it!

So let’s not let young women and little girls down, whether it’s on the playground, in the workplace, or in the political arena. Young women need role models. They need to know they can be powerful and control their own lives. By putting Hillary in the Oval Office we send that message loud and clear for all to hear. Little girls everywhere need to know that to be important they don’t have to emulate Brittany Spears or other similarly-exploited women. We can do it!

Think about the legacy we’ll leave behind when we support Hillary Clinton for President of the United States. Let’s put a stop to the psychological “gang banging” of women and girls. Let’s stand up and be counted by way of the hard-won votes we can now cast!

Marcia A. Pappas, President, NOW New York State

Whoa. I just realized that Marcia Pappas, the illustrious author of the aforementioned two chunks of political garbage, is the PRESIDENT of NOW New York. This does not encourage faith in the voting prowess of NOW members.

The only time I feel ashamed to be a woman is when I read stuff like this.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 mousewords February 2, 2008 at 4:42 pm

I find “gang rape” a very poor metaphor for political bullying. Yes, it’s been a long, hard history for women–but you know something? Guys get bullied, too. Insecure people who want to feel strong will pick on anyone they can. It’s a human failing, across both genders.

As a woman, I have a tendency to feel a bit prickly when anyone wants to give me a “head start,” so to speak, just because of my gender. I would rather earn my accomplishments on a level playing field–skill against skill alone. Have women had to fight for the chance to compete? Of course. But fighting a battle is a different thing from getting a free ride just for being female.

A woman running for the Presidency is a positive example to girls, regardless of whether she wins or not. If she wins, she shows it can be done. If she doesn’t, it tells some young girl somewhere that there is another goal to reach for.

Proverbs 31 is one of the best examples of what men and women can accomplish together. Both are able to make great achievements in life, honor each other for individual victories, and get along very happily.

I like competing with the boys. I respect their achievements, and it makes my day when I can prove myself and be respected for it in return.

2 Mithra February 2, 2008 at 4:58 pm

I’m not all that political, so I’m not trying to stir anything up, I promise, but I’m curious: why you would be horrified with either Obama or Hillary and whom you would prefer?

3 mykoleary February 3, 2008 at 8:42 am

Why this is so poignantly disgusting is in the fact that the NAACP would NEVER liken the public being lynched due to another person/group’s supporting Clinton over Obama. (BTW – I was going to replace “any group” for “NAACP” above, but that would be a lie knowing that for one, NOW has already stepped way off the deep end here.)

4 tamar February 3, 2008 at 11:24 am

“I am horrified by the thought of Obama OR Hillary becoming President”
because you’re a Republican and don’t want a Democrat to win the election? not now, not ever?

i think it’s ridiculous that someone would compare ANYTHING with gang rape, including what goes on in politics.

i don’t understand why i should vote based on my gender or race. maybe the fact that i’m not american has something to do with it, i don’t know. i would pick my candidate based on his or her ideas and plans for the future. who i think would be best for me and my country. who would most likely be able to clean up the mess that the bush administration has made of the country and the rest of the world.

and this is for mithra, who commented before me. i’m always intrigued when people say they are not that political. what does that mean in your case? i mean, most people read the newspaper and watch the news, right?

(oh & i’m not a total stranger; you might know me as youlovetam on twitter)

5 Mithra February 3, 2008 at 1:13 pm

Tamar: When I said I’m not all that political, I meant that I don’t like to get into huge political debates. I read the newspaper and the get news via the internet (no watching the news since I don’t have a tv), and I have fairly strong opinions about which party and candidate would be best.

I should have been more clear that I was merely curious as to what Marina meant by her statement and why she feels the way she does, and that I wasn’t intending to try and sway her opinion or start some sort of heated political discussion.

6 Damon February 17, 2008 at 3:32 pm

One question I have always had – if women demand equality, why are they still not required to register for the US Draft (Selective Service System these days, how PC). In my mind, that is quite the insult yet never have I heard women’s rights push for that.

There’s some good information regarding that exact argument here:
http://www.sss.gov/wmbkgr.htm

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

One of Marina Martin’s Blogs