David Cook (on American Idol) literally rocks Eleanor Rigby:
{ 0 comments }
David Cook (on American Idol) literally rocks Eleanor Rigby:
{ 0 comments }
If everyone took care to perform their job — garbage collector, parent, grocery store patron (return your damned cart!), efficiency consultant — to the best of their abilities, the world would be an infinitely better place.
If your job is to blog, I think you can take two fucking seconds to spellcheck your posts. One pro-blogger in particular seems to have a handful of egregious grammatical errors in every post. Cut it out. If I could find the Unsubscribe button in my German Firefox build, I’d click it!
{ 0 comments }
Apparently it is illegal to own a dildo in the state of Texas unless it is for “a bona fide medical, psychiatric, judicial, legislative, or law enforcement purpose.”
Below is an episode of “Dildo Diaries” chronicling this legislative embarrassment. (This is not safe for work. Duh.)
This whole mind-boggling issue aside, I am most struck by the truly enviable level of professionalism displayed by the store clerk at the sex store. Wow. I would trust her with top-level government security work any day. Not just anyone can stand behind a glass case of dildos and tell you, completely seriously and with a completely straight face, that they do not sell dildos there.
Source: http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/03/05/its-about-life-babies-life-babies/
{ 3 comments }
Doesn’t this just make you want to put birth control in the water supply?
A 16-year-old Argentine girl has given birth to female triplets – for the second time.
The girl, named only as Pamela, had her first set of female triplets aged 15, having first given birth to a son when she was just 14.
All seven children were born prematurely but without any kind of fertility treatment.
So, how do we discourage her continued procreation, and discourage her peers from repeating her mistakes? Why, build her a house, of course!
Pamela’s family already receives help from the provincial authorities, which donated land and built them a house when the first set of triplets was born.
Pamela’s mother, who cleans houses to support her daughter and rapidly increasing number of grandchildren, says they will now seek more assistance from the government for the new additions to the family.
Not common sense! Nooo! Not that!
Some Argentines are arguing that perhaps what Pamela needs is more advice on contraception.
Source: BBC News
{ 2 comments }
I don’t get much traffic at this blog.* Google Analytics tells me that it has been found via search engines exactly once so far:

*I said this on the phone a few days about my collective new blogs. After all, they’ve only been live for a week and I have done next-to-nothing to promote them yet. No sooner had those words left my lips than I saw Guinness Globetrotter had received 10,000 unique visitors from StumbleUpon in its first 24 hours, and a couple hours later the official Twitter blog sent a good chunk of traffic to Oh, Twitter. I remain amused (and appreciative).
{ 0 comments }
Despite embracing the controversial nature of many of the posts here, I don’t want to name names here, and would prefer that any comments be of a more generic nature.
That said… have you ever found that a particular blogger just pisses you off, even though you’ve never met them, haven’t interacted with them personally, and have no concrete reasons for your feelings?
There’s one medium-profile blogger whose every post sets me off. Even though they write in a niche of interest to me, I had to unsubscribe from their feed, because every one of their sentences just dripped with smugness [to my eyes]. Their blog literally made me angry.
My attempt at objectivity is that, if we generally accept that a blogger can be “friendly” then we should also be able to pick up on unfriendliness.
Am I nuts? Has this happened to anyone else?
{ 2 comments }
A stay-at-home mother should never be compensated by society for sitting at home doing laundry.
If her partner decides that she is worthy of a token salary for doing the laundry, then it’s the partner’s personal and private decision to compensate her. If her adult child decides that her staying home provided a tangible benefit that should be rewarded, then that adult child can retroactively compensate her accordingly.
If you think it’s acceptable, or even mandatory, for society to compensate full-time parents, then you had better equally support those same stay-at-home parents compensating their children if they do a shoddy job.
Every other job is tied to performance and deliverables, isn’t it?
{ 3 comments }
Then maybe you should stop selling your companies to Microhoo or Google.
You should definitely stop building new companies that have selling to Microhoo or Google as an exit strategy (or worse, goal!).
{ 1 comment }
Over the last few years I have heard people voice an increasing amount of displeasure with the existing literary canon, pointing out that most items within the canon are included because the general population has poor taste and/or no appreciation or understanding of truly great writing.
Fine. Agreed. I’m a lot more misanthropic than they come, and I have raised an eyebrow over many a “classic.” I question whether Emily Dickinson was a poetic genius or actually had no grasp of the proper function of an emdash. (She was a shut-in…) I’ve read every page of Salinger in an attempt to find a single redeeming sentence, and failed. (Holden Caulfield needed a good spanking.) Every time I see “A Farewell to Arms” on my bookshelf I’m overcome with an urge to teach Hemingway how to write a complex sentence via ouija board.
The existing canon gives us a common language with which we can communicate about literature to others. When I read “Prague” by Arthur Phillips, I immediately fell in love with its Fitzgeraldesque prose. I knew to recommend it to others who loved Fitzgerald and knew not to recommend it to the Hemingway fans. (I also gifted it to a new friend only to discover he was in the Hemingway camp — oops!)
Without this “alphabet,” so to speak, it would be substantially more difficult to find new books that I want to read, or to suggest new books to others. Each novel I picked up would be a complete gamble, and given that I had a lot of trouble putting down a half-read book — even if it’s Salinger! — that would translate into a lot of time wasted on lousy books that could be spent reading good books.
Perhaps an even more compelling reason to sample the canon: you’ll know not to name a children’s bedroom set “Lolita” like our friends at Woolworths:
The Lolita Midsleeper Combi, a whitewashed wooden bed with pull-out desk and cupboard intended for girls aged about 6, was on sale on the Woolworths website for £395.
Whereas many mothers were familiar with Vladimir Nabokov and his famous novel, it seems that the Woolworths staff were not. At first they were baffled by the fuss. A spokesman for the company told The Times: “What seems to have happened is the staff who run the website had never heard of Lolita, and to be honest no one else here had either. We had to look it up on Wikipedia. But we certainly know who she is now.”
At first the store refused to withdraw the product. It said that although it wanted to appeal to the family market, “we also have to respond to customer demands and follow current trends.”
As one of the few people who apparently read the book (which remains one of my all-time favorites to this day), I would like to remind everyone that Lolita didn’t even lose her virginity to her step-father. I’m not saying it’s right for a man to court and kill a woman to have sex with her 12-year-old, but little Lolita already knew the ropes.
Speaking of the canon, am I the only person who saw the commercial for LOST where a fat guy fell off a hill and shouted, “Piggy!” (?)
At least one commenter also read the book:
I can’t wait to see Woolworth’s new line of Humbert-Humbert men’s reclining chairs.
Maybe I have a little faith in humanity left…
{ 0 comments }
I’m very seriously considering starting an anti-National Organization for Women blog. Maybe one already exists. (*Googles*) Not as far as I can tell. There needs to be one. The mere word “now,” previously an innocent chronological reference, has been tarnished forever.
For the record, I am horrified by the thought of Obama OR Hillary becoming President. But I am particularly horrified by the suggestion that I should consider Hillary to be more qualified than Obama for anything besides an annual pap smear on the basis of her gender.
Apparently NOW (New York State chapter) believes that Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Obama instead of Hillary is a “betrayal” of women. The only thing that stopped me from losing my (delicious) banana smoothie lunch was the fact that the press release was clearly written AND approved by people with fifth-grade writing abilities.
The full text (directly from their website):
Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, and the Family and Medical Leave Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.
And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one). “They” are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). “They” are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women’s money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future.
This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation- to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who “know what’s best for us.
Worse: In a second press release, they liken anyone who does not wholeheartedly support Hillary to a GANG RAPIST. (Or, in their uneducated words, a “ganged” rapist.) What delusional freaks! I don’t even know how to begin to touch on that vile garbage. Clearly (and thankfully) no one involved in the creation of that gem has actually experienced sexual violence (or perhaps even Real Life).
In case they take it down, and to avoid being accused of selective copy and paste, here’s the entire piece:
We’ve all witnessed scenarios where, on the playground little girls are being taunted by little boys while both girls and boys stand idle, afraid to speak up or even cheering. Or, in the workplace males tease young and older female co-workers; make obscene gestures, inappropriate comments, laughing and expecting (often correctly) that everyone will join in. Then there was that movie where Jodie Foster portrayed the true story of woman who was ganged raped in a bar while others looked on and encouraged the realization. Still others pretended the rape didn’t happen. In short, gang raping of women is commonplace in our culture both physically and metaphorically.
This past week, we witnessed just such a phenomenon involving men who are afraid of a powerful woman. Hillary Clinton, in her quest for her Presidential nomination, has in fact endured infantile taunting and wildly inappropriate commentary. Indeed we have witnessed almost comical attacks by John Edwards who in turn sided with Barak Obama as both snickered at Clinton’s “breakdown,” which consisted of a very short dewy-eyed moment. Now John Kerry, who should certainly know better after his own “swiftboating,” has joined the playground gang.
But here’s the news. Every woman knows how it feels! There are those who will dismiss, defend or even shame those around them into believing that we progressives are making a mountain out of a mole hill. But that’s the game plan of the patriarchal system that has persisted for millennia. Because they can’t frighten Hillary they’ve decided to control her with the time-old trick of patriarchal ridicule. Women, you know what I mean!
Pundits want to know what happened in New Hampshire. Why didn’t the polls see it coming? How could they have gotten it so wrong? Well, aside from the thousands of women and progressive men who made calls from their homes, dropped literature, and held house parties for undecided voters, the truth of the matter is…women get it! That’s why, when women in New Hampshire could vote in private, they came out in droves for Hillary. They’d seen more Hillary bashing than had Iowa’s women, and the polls stopped too early to measure their collective reaction. What happened is that women stood up and said “We’re fed up and we’re not going to take it anymore! We won’t sit idly by and watch, while you gang bang one of us.” One woman told me she didn’t even want to vote for Hillary because she feared that her campaign would be the most dreadful blood bath in the history of politics. I asked her “if Hillary is willing to stick her neck out for us, should we not be brave enough to stand strong behind her?” She agreed and said of course she would vote for Hillary.
We have waited a long time to see our first truly viable women presidential candidate. And what we see now during the debates is what women and girls have experienced from time immemorial. But it seems John’s recent alliance with Barak sent a clear message to women everywhere. The message is that if a woman gets too powerful, she can count on the good ole boys ganging up on her. Hillary is a powerful, strong and intelligent woman and she deserves our support. Let us remember what we as women’s rights supporters, are charged to do: SUPPORT WOMEN!
And I, your writer,certainly speak from the belly of the beast. I was in Iowa for ten days with other feminist leaders, donating our personal time and money to help with Hillary’s campaign. And in spite of our shortfall in Iowa, we did make a difference. Our efforts gave Hillary second place in the precinct we walked. Let me tell you why.
Our job on caucus night was to transport eight women from a nursing home to their caucus site. These were eighty-to-ninety-year-old women who came out in the cold weather and climbed into our vans to stand for Hillary. As we talked with glee about the possibility of our first women president, we were overjoyed to hear stories of their dedication to making it happen. One woman said “I never thought I would live long enough to see a woman president.” Another woman said “It’s about time; we need to have a woman as our President.” These were women who were born around the time that women won the right to vote. They’d heard first-hand stories of that struggle from their mothers and grandmothers. They fought long and hard to see a day when they could have their own credit cards, own their own homes and be in control of their own bodies. They remember all too well when it was legal for a man to beat and/or rape his wife because she was HIS property. They remember when “rape” was ignored by people in the community and law enforcement officials. “She must have done something to deserve it” was common language in those days. Today we still see variations on this same behavior, more subtle perhaps, through success of our efforts, but nonetheless still abusive.
Now those senior citizens we transported stood tall for Hillary, and want us all to know that to have a woman president is to send a clear message to little girls everywhere: “Yes, you can do great things and even become President of the United States.” Those senior citizens really get it!
So let’s not let young women and little girls down, whether it’s on the playground, in the workplace, or in the political arena. Young women need role models. They need to know they can be powerful and control their own lives. By putting Hillary in the Oval Office we send that message loud and clear for all to hear. Little girls everywhere need to know that to be important they don’t have to emulate Brittany Spears or other similarly-exploited women. We can do it!
Think about the legacy we’ll leave behind when we support Hillary Clinton for President of the United States. Let’s put a stop to the psychological “gang banging” of women and girls. Let’s stand up and be counted by way of the hard-won votes we can now cast!
Marcia A. Pappas, President, NOW New York State
Whoa. I just realized that Marcia Pappas, the illustrious author of the aforementioned two chunks of political garbage, is the PRESIDENT of NOW New York. This does not encourage faith in the voting prowess of NOW members.
The only time I feel ashamed to be a woman is when I read stuff like this.
{ 6 comments }